How Did We Get Here?
Posted: Monday, December 12, 2005
by straight talk
Today we hear consistently the barrage in our news that so and so is an ultra Liberal or someone is an Ultra conservative. You see the fighting between Republican or Democrat and your perception of our government is that - quite frankly - it is lousy. In fact it is so lousy many don’t even bother to vote anymore, except for those who can be sold there is a real difference or they love the party program. You may even be open to suggestion that a change has to be made but you don't know what and you are probably so conditioned that the current system needs to be replaced that you will except anything that comes along. Regretfully, the bottom line is our political leadership are all joined in any number of ways, and for the greater number, they are all the same. Think not, then let's examine this opinion.
What I am trying to say is that people who are similar have a tendency to accept something if it sounds plausible and they will buy into the success of the endeavor when their perceptions and ideas are similar. Certainly wealthy people like ways to become even more wealthy. Poor people like ways to become wealthy and everyone likes a tax break. Perhaps differences would be only in the timing, approach, or actions taken. If this theory is correct then you do not have any real differences, but only in the method and approach to achieve such. So my opinion is that a majority of our politicians have, for the most part, bought into a concept that supercedes all other issues, and that they all work toward the success of that idea, but with a different views as to how to achieve that end and when. However, the real drawback in this entire theory is that there is no counter thinking or alternative view or diversity of ideas for consideration. If Congress continues to be the domain of the rich, then we should certainly expect laws will be created which are favorable to their way of thinking and concepts.
What does that say to the average person? It says rather distinctly that some have to sacrifice for the overall good. So when you ask- "why don’t they", or "I can’t understand", or "how can that happen", or "how can they allow that", you must understand that only the things that support or might impact the goal will be acted on. Why do I have this opinion? Take a look at how woefully unprepared the government was when Katrina struck. This was a major catastrophe in the making for years, yet the results of the government response shocked the nation. Their inability to execute a plan, or for that matter even have an effective plan, has placed a major impact on the economy of this nation and our governments ability to continue moving forward with anything. Therefore they are being forced to address the matter as urgently as possible to get back on course. In place of a gradual rise in fuel prices the prices jumped overnight. They had to take immediate action to stop this major impact to the goal. However, the cost for damage and associated aspects will go into the billions and we the people will be paying for it for years. It is the old monkey wrench!
We can look at the consistent rise in the costs of everything, the eradication of good jobs which are replaced by low paying jobs, corruption, discrimination, hiring practice and laying off of older workers. We can look at family issues that impact the average Americans situation and you could bring up issue after issue. Just look at the debate surrounding Iraq and you see everything I am talking about rolled into just one topic. The majority at one point all agreed we should invade but "when" was always a question. The "how" became the next item - boycott, invade, continue economic sanctions or not? This was not a difference of if we should have, because it made good sense in Global aspects. That leads us to consider it was poor planning, a lack of planning, or was it right on plan?
Could it be that these people that lead us are that totally inept, and that is the entire crew- Republican or Democrat? I must say that while I have always had my own reservations about "higher education", you do have to admit they must have some thought processes in order to pass their tests. Then I ask rhetorically is it faulty teaching, ability, or that there is some other reason for the incompetence, or could it be right on target? I don't know but in my opinion I sense we all agree the entire aspect was not fully thought out [read my article on crisis management].
Quite sadly for us middle Americans until we the people start to look deeper at what is being said and vote in people who have our interests first, [if there are any average people we can vote in who still have values]. If we continue to remain inactive with an I don't care response, then we will continue with the same old story line and we will continue asking the same old tired questions until we arrive at their desired destination and you ask one more final question
- "how did we get here"?
Robert T. Melaccio Sr. Copyright ©2005 Robert Melaccio
This Article has been viewed 199 times. (Not updated in real-time.)
No comments yet.We want your comments! If you can read this, you don't have javascript enabled, so you can't use this comment system. Please enable javascript.